IMA Web

The Website of the International Music Association

Submit News  |  FAQ  |  Advanced Search  |  Reviews  Friday, July 30, 2010 - 10:23 AM
Search
Main Menu
· Home
· Login or Register
· Lost Password

Departments
· Classical Music
· IMA Forums
· News
· Reviews
· Music Links

Site Options
· About the IMA
· Members List
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Top 10 Round-up
· Topics
User's Login
 Username
 Password
 Remember me


Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like a theme manager, comments configuration and posting comments with your name.
News Blast
Visit The Paly Environmental Initiative to see an exciting project that helps keep our air clean! Started by Palo Alto High School freshman Michael Abrams and Renee Singh.
Fun Fact!

Fun Fact Quiz
What is this?

What is this weird-looking instrument?

Click here to email us your answer!

Read previous Fun Facts by clicking here!

Days in Music
On a day like today...
Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus: Symphony No. 38 in D-Major, "Prague"

Page: 2/24
(6245 total words in this text)
(5815 Reads) Printer friendly page

II. The work as a whole

One of the most striking features of this work is the absence of a minuet, a fact which has led some to call it the “Symphony #38 in D [without Minuet]”.  The title appears this way in many German editions, but most English and American versions refer to it as the “Prague” symphony. Various reasons have been given for the omission, including the rather fanciful assertion that the residents of were not as fond of dancing as the Viennese were. However, because the very first evening Mozart arrived in Prague he went to a ball with people dancing to his music, this reason can be dismissed[11]. Landon[12] states that not having a minuet “must mean something, for it is the only one of the last six [symphonies] to do so,” but he doesn’t offer a reason. Taken as a whole, though, K. 504 is not any shorter in length than his other symphonies, the balance is not harmed by the lack of a minuet.

Another noticeable feature of this symphony is the highly virtuosic writing for the wind instruments. This is a fact that many musicologists point to when saying that the work was composed for Prague, whose orchestras boasted particularly fine wind players[13].  Throughout the work, and especially in the last movement, important lines and sometimes whole passages are played by the wind section (for example, mvmt. III, m.31-46).

The rich contrapuntal writing also bears note.  Not until the final movement of his 41rst symphony does Mozart surpass the “contrapuntal virtuosity”[14] that he exhibits in the development of the first movement of K. 504. Landon[15] calls the whole first movement “one of Mozart’s supreme contrapuntal achievements.”  Downes[16] states that despite “a half dozen contrasting themes, it never becomes confused.”  This style of composition is continued in the ensuing movements (ex. mvmt. III 184-203).



[11] GSM pg. 684

[12] GTS pg. 74

[13] GSM pg. 685

[14] GTS pg. 74

[15] GTS pg. 74

[16] GSM pg. 684

Previous Previous (1/24) Next (3/24) Next

[ Back to Acticles on Music | Sections index ]

Report Bugs  |  Tasks  |  Developers 
The IMA Web © 2004 by IMA Department of Technology and the Office of Web Development. All rights reserved. Contact the IMA at ima@imusicassociation.com.